[USML Announce] Rule change for 2006 to think about

[Andrew R. Klein]

I've also been a supporter of the rule that Buddha suggests.  Let's put it
on the table again for a vote next year.

 

-Andy

 

-------------------------------------

Andrew R. Klein

Indiana University School of Law-Indianapolis

(317) 274-2099

 

  _____  

From: announce-bounces at usml.net [mailto:announce-bounces at usml.net] On Behalf
Of springkerb at aol.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2005 12:02 PM
To: announce at usml.net
Subject: Re: [USML Announce] Rule change for 2006 to think about

 

I have always supported allowing the stats of players traded into the other
league to count for the remainder of that season and will continue to do so.
As Rich noted, our votes on this issue have always been close.

 

Mark 

 
-----Original Message-----
From: bbuddhas at aol.com
To: announce at usml.net
Sent: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 10:47:36 -0500
Subject: [USML Announce] Rule change for 2006 to think about

I would like to spin the wheels on a proposed rule change to begin in the
2006 season.  We put this one in place in my NL Roto league and it seemed
fairer and has worked well.  When a player is traded to the "Other League"
(NL in our case) his stats continue to accrue for your USML team.  Then, if
at the next roster freeze date he is still on an NL roster he would not be
eligible to be retained. 

 

 In addition we do not allow anyone who comes over from the "Other League"
to be claimed during the season but we don't use FAAB when picking up free
agents so i don't believe we need to implement that.

 

I feel that injuries are part of the game and should you get a guy that
breaks down, that is your tough luck but to have a player just plucked from
your roster in mid-season seems to put too much of an element of luck into
the equation.  Maybe there is history within the league that would keep
folks from supporting this rule and again i obviously shouldn't be
implemented to 2006 since certain players "trade probabilities" effected
their auction price but I would be interested in hearing people's comments.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/announce_usml.net/attachments/20050323/b79dd6af/attachment.htm