[USML Announce] Really?

[Jeffrey H. Winick]

Packers 28
Lions 26  in Green Bay!!

Bears 20
Greenies 17

'nuff said.

-----Original Message-----
From: announce-bounces at usml.net [mailto:announce-bounces at usml.net] On
Behalf Of Mark Blocker
Sent: Sunday, October 03, 2010 10:31 PM
To: 'USML Announcements'
Subject: RE: [USML Announce] Really?

Here are some comments that circulated after last weekend's football
games.

Now, here are some stats from this weekend.

Bears lose.

10 Sacks.  Ten!

Just 59 yards rushing.

2 picks, as usual.

Lost fumble.

Gave up almost 200 yards rushing.

No smoke and mirrors stuff from special teams.

Bears fans, comment.



-----Original Message-----
From: announce-bounces at usml.net [mailto:announce-bounces at usml.net] On
Behalf
Of Jeff Winick
Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2010 8:07 AM
To: USML Announcements
Subject: Re: [USML Announce] Really?

Fruiter is correct. 43 yards. My mistake. That certainly makes all the
difference in the world. 

I am curious about the penalties. Which one cost them the game? The
holding
call that gave Arod enough time to find Finley?  One of the two
egregiously
stupid personal fouls in the winning drive?  Hard to know which one
you're
referring to.  There are so many to choose from. Actually I thought the
missed holding call (Peppers) on Arod's rushing touchdown was the only
thing
that kept you in the game. Was that the one?  But you still lost. 

18 penalties and an inability to strike quickly with an admittedly great
QB
due to the utter absence of a running game and an offensive line that
doesn't know how to block without jumping or holding. That's what I saw.
Apparently you were watching a different game. 

TOeFuKi

P. S. That was for you Buddha. Hope you appreciate this analysis as
well. 

Sent from my iPhone

On Sep 28, 2010, at 6:51 AM, "JOHN FRUIT, FAF ADVISORS INC."
<jfruit1 at bloomberg.net> wrote:

> for the record, the Packers' RBs had 43 yds rushing to the Bears' RBs
38.
The  
> Packers had 18 penalties....if they would have had 17 penalties, the
Bears

> would not have won, period.
> 
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
---
> Material based on data from sources deemed reliable;
accuracy/completeness
not guaranteed. Not for use as a primary basis of investment decisions;
not
to be construed to meet needs of any investor. Not a representation or
solicitation of an offer to sell/buy any security. Securities may not be
eligible for solicitation in all states. Opinions subject to change.
Past
performance does not guarantee future results.
> _______________________________________________
> announce mailing list
> announce at usml.net
> http://lists.usml.net/mailman/listinfo/announce
_______________________________________________
announce mailing list
announce at usml.net
http://lists.usml.net/mailman/listinfo/announce

_______________________________________________
announce mailing list
announce at usml.net
http://lists.usml.net/mailman/listinfo/announce