[USML Announce] Daily Roster Audit Compliance Report

[Richard Robbins]

I believe Cardinal Mark has it right.


On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 5:53 PM, <springkerb at aol.com> wrote:

> This came up a long time ago, and at the time I think we decided empty
> slots were allowed. However, I also thought there were later amendments
> that changed that--but I may be wrong.
>
> We have both AB and IP minimums.
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: bljansen at gmail.com
> To: USML Announcements **
> Sent: Tue, Apr 2, 2013 11:43 am
> Subject: Re: [USML Announce] Daily Roster Audit Compliance Report
>
>  Yes. See Article X(4).
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Dennis Adams <dadams17 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> AFV moved Juan Rivera from its reserve roster to its Active Roster in the
>> CI slot.  Therefore, I now have 23 active and 16 reserve.
>>
>> In regards to the rules though, I agree that there does not appear to be
>> a minimum number of players required and that the rule serves only to
>> impose a maximum.  Leaving empty spots on your active roster only prevents
>> you from accruing stats and does not provide an advantage.  I suppose the 1
>> argument is that of batting average, but I assume there is a minimum
>> number of at bats that must be met?
>>
>>
>>
>>  _______________________________________________
> announce mailing listannounce at usml.nethttp://lists.usml.net/mailman/listinfo/announce
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> announce mailing list
> announce at usml.net
> http://lists.usml.net/mailman/listinfo/announce
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://usml.net/pipermail/announce_usml.net/attachments/20130402/f1d989ac/attachment-0001.html>