[USML Announce] A New Question?

[Richard Robbins]

Yeah right.  On the other hand, don't rule out a massive Riptorns MRH deal.


One of these days we should think through that ambiguity, ideally before it
becomes a point of contention.

On Thursday, August 8, 2013, springkerb wrote:

> I think it's been ambiguous since we went to daily reporting.  But don't
> be so coy.  Winick is totally dumping to you, isn't he?
>
>
> Sent via the Samsung GALAXY S®4 Active™, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone
>
>
>
> -------- Original message --------
> From: Richard Robbins <rerobbins at itinker.net <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
> 'rerobbins at itinker.net');>>
> Date: 08/08/2013 7:33 PM (GMT-06:00)
> To: USML Announcements <announce at usml.net <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
> 'announce at usml.net');>>
> Subject: [USML Announce] A New Question?
>
>
> Have we ever discussed how to interpret the rule that says during this
> part of the year teams can only trade with teams contiguous or tied in the
> standings?  Does that mean standings as of the start of a reporting period?
>  Start of a day?  Any moment in time?  With the web site live standings
> feature, we can see teams bouncing around minute by minute.
>
> I don't have any trades in the pipeline, so I'm not asking this with any
> hidden agenda. I am really curious about how to think of this issue.  What
> do you think?
>
> -- Rich
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://usml.net/pipermail/announce_usml.net/attachments/20130808/caac1e2c/attachment-0001.html>